<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash for Clunkers: What Might It Really Mean to Car Buyers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/</link>
	<description>Money-saving deals and simple advice for saving money</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:16:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: av21093</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>av21093</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Do you know whether the car that is traded in must have been registered/insured for the last year by the person who is trying to trade it in?  I&#039;d like to buy someone&#039;s daily-driven clunker and apply it towards a new car for myself; as far as I can see, I&#039;m still helping get a clunker off the road and helping out the manufacturers.  Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know whether the car that is traded in must have been registered/insured for the last year by the person who is trying to trade it in?  I'd like to buy someone's daily-driven clunker and apply it towards a new car for myself; as far as I can see, I'm still helping get a clunker off the road and helping out the manufacturers.  Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: recessionjobhelp</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>recessionjobhelp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-86</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t qualify because my car already gets good gas mileage. But my dad swears by the car buying process here: 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://excarsalesman.typepad.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://excarsalesman.typepad.com/&lt;/a&gt;

I have a feeling dealers are going to automatically increase prices because of the increased demand (artificial) for great MPG cars. So the thousands of savings from this bill for consumers is not entirely accurate.

With the price increase, I&#039;m certain some markets you&#039;ll come out even as if they never offered this voucher. It is poorly written legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't qualify because my car already gets good gas mileage. But my dad swears by the car buying process here:<br />
<a href="http://excarsalesman.typepad.com/" rel="nofollow">http://excarsalesman.typepad.com/</a></p>
<p>I have a feeling dealers are going to automatically increase prices because of the increased demand (artificial) for great MPG cars. So the thousands of savings from this bill for consumers is not entirely accurate.</p>
<p>With the price increase, I'm certain some markets you'll come out even as if they never offered this voucher. It is poorly written legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Tuttle</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Tuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Set the gas price at a constant $3 a gallon. If there&#039;s excess revenue created (and there should be plenty), use the extra cash toward creating cars that run on alternative energy sources, primarily electricity. If gas is cheap, the public will never go for electric cars en masse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Set the gas price at a constant $3 a gallon. If there's excess revenue created (and there should be plenty), use the extra cash toward creating cars that run on alternative energy sources, primarily electricity. If gas is cheap, the public will never go for electric cars en masse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Brown</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-37</guid>
		<description>In the UK there hasn&#039;t really been any pretence that the scrappage scheme is designed to have any environmental benefit - there&#039;s no limit on mileage or emissions of the car you can buy. 

As a boost to the car industry it could see them through a tight spot, assuming the market has picked up by the time it ends. If it has not it spells trouble for auto makers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the UK there hasn't really been any pretence that the scrappage scheme is designed to have any environmental benefit - there's no limit on mileage or emissions of the car you can buy. </p>
<p>As a boost to the car industry it could see them through a tight spot, assuming the market has picked up by the time it ends. If it has not it spells trouble for auto makers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohiopapa</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>ohiopapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-33</guid>
		<description>This program is solely a sop to the carmakers (and mostly the UAW), a political ploy framed as a help to consumers.  Surely the dealers will negotiate tougher, knowing the $4500 is psychological &quot;free money&quot; to the buyer.

Mother Nature suffers, because we are encouraged to consume more in the form of another car manufactured, that otherwise would not have been bought so soon.

Consumers suffer, because they are encouraged to go into debt once again, rather than making do with a car likely to be paid off.

The taxpayer suffers, having to foot the bill.

Bottom line - &quot;cash for clunkers&quot; is a terrible idea.  Much better is a $1/gallon gas tax, balanced by a decrease in payroll taxes.  That would actually boost purchases of fuel-efficient cars, with no average cost to taxpayers.  

If only President Obama would spend some of that famed political capital to do the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This program is solely a sop to the carmakers (and mostly the UAW), a political ploy framed as a help to consumers.  Surely the dealers will negotiate tougher, knowing the $4500 is psychological "free money" to the buyer.</p>
<p>Mother Nature suffers, because we are encouraged to consume more in the form of another car manufactured, that otherwise would not have been bought so soon.</p>
<p>Consumers suffer, because they are encouraged to go into debt once again, rather than making do with a car likely to be paid off.</p>
<p>The taxpayer suffers, having to foot the bill.</p>
<p>Bottom line - "cash for clunkers" is a terrible idea.  Much better is a $1/gallon gas tax, balanced by a decrease in payroll taxes.  That would actually boost purchases of fuel-efficient cars, with no average cost to taxpayers.  </p>
<p>If only President Obama would spend some of that famed political capital to do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Posts &#171; WordPress.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...]  Cash for Clunkers: What Might It Really Mean to Car Buyers? Yesterday, the House approved a plan that&#8217;ll give electronic vouchers up to $4,500 to car owners who trade in [...] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Cash for Clunkers: What Might It Really Mean to Car Buyers? Yesterday, the House approved a plan that&#8217;ll give electronic vouchers up to $4,500 to car owners who trade in [...] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clunker credit isn&#8217;t a windfall for car buyers &#124; Mound City Money &#124; STLtoday</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Clunker credit isn&#8217;t a windfall for car buyers &#124; Mound City Money &#124; STLtoday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-29</guid>
		<description>[...] policy and ineffective economic policy and why it will hurt the poor. Now, with the help of The Cheapskate Blog, let&#8217;s examine what the clunker credit does for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] policy and ineffective economic policy and why it will hurt the poor. Now, with the help of The Cheapskate Blog, let&#8217;s examine what the clunker credit does for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenlady350</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>greenlady350</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Interesting to see the other side of the story.  Thought it sounded like a good idea at first.  Thanks for the post.
http://pollutionwebsite.com/emissions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to see the other side of the story.  Thought it sounded like a good idea at first.  Thanks for the post.<br />
<a href="http://pollutionwebsite.com/emissions" rel="nofollow">http://pollutionwebsite.com/emissions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Congress Considers 'Cash for Clunkers' Plan - Page 2 - Southern Maryland Community Forums</title>
		<link>http://money.blogs.time.com/2009/06/10/cash-for-clunkers-what-might-it-really-mean-to-car-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Congress Considers 'Cash for Clunkers' Plan - Page 2 - Southern Maryland Community Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cheapskate.blogs.time.com/?p=99#comment-24</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
